Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-CV Events: Did the Design Influence the Outcome?

The Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP)1 was a real world study planned to evaluate in a pragmatic manner whether Chlorthalidone (CTD), as compared with Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), would reduce the risk of major nonfatal cardiovascular disease outcomes in elderly hypertensive participants (≥65 years) who were receiving HCTZ (25 or 50 mg) at baseline. This study being a real world study lacks the robustness of a randomized controlled trial. The principle limitation being unequal exposure of the two diuretics, prolonged unknown duration of exposure to HCTZ vs a short exposure to CTD (Median 2.4 years). In the high risk population with history of MI/Stroke, CTD conferred a lower risk of primary outcome as compared to low risk population where no significant difference in outcome was seen in both diuretics. Other factors included, lack of established dose equivalency of the two diuretics and absence of use of 12.5 mg HCTZ in older hypertensives. How to cite this article: Pareek A, Messerli FH, Ram CVS. Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-CV Events: Did the Design Influence the Outcome? J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):93-93.

Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns.

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.

Therapeutic Usefulness of a Novel Calcium Channel Blocker Azelnidipine in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

The prevalence of hypertension and comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease in India is alarmingly high. Amlodipine, an older-generation calcium channel blocker (CCB), is currently the gold standard for hypertension management in India. However, it has several disadvantages, including reflex tachycardia and pedal edema. Therefore, an effective antihypertensive agent that does not cause these adverse effects and provides end-organ protection is required for the holistic management of hypertension in the country. Azelnidipine is a new-generation CCB that has recently been approved for the treatment of hypertension in India. This review provides an overview of the utility of azelnidipine for hypertension control, including comparisons with traditional CCBs such as amlodipine. It discusses the key antihypertensive effects of azelnidipine as well as its advantages in the prevention of tachycardia and associated complications. In addition, this review highlights the extensive cardio- and renoprotective activities of azelnidipine, including its effects on systolic and diastolic function and urinary albumin excretion. Overall, this substantial body of evidence supports the use of azelnidipine for the treatment of hypertension, especially in India. It suggests that the adoption of azelnidipine as the new gold standard CCB could help India battle its hypertension epidemic.

The collateral damage of COVID-19 to cardiovascular services: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on care and outcomes across non-COVID-19 cardiovascular (CV) diseases is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to quantify the effect and investigate for variation by CV disease, geographic region, country income classification and the time course of the pandemic. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2019 to December 2021, Medline and Embase databases were searched for observational studies comparing a pandemic and pre-pandemic period with relation to CV disease hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, outpatient consultations, and mortality. Observational data were synthesised by incidence rate ratios (IRR) and risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021265930). A total of 158 studies, covering 49 countries and 6 continents, were used for quantitative synthesis. Most studies (80%) reported information for high-income countries (HICs). Across all CV disease and geographies there were fewer hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, and outpatient consultations during the pandemic. By meta-regression, in low-middle income countries (LMICs) compared to HICs the decline in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) hospitalisations (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.94) and revascularisation (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) was more severe. In LMICs, but not HICs, in-hospital mortality increased for STEMI (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.37) and heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12). The magnitude of decline in hospitalisations for CV diseases did not differ between the first and second wave. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial global collateral CV damage during the COVID-19 pandemic with disparity in severity by country income classification.

The Deadly Duo of Hypertension and Diabetes in India: Further Affirmation from a New Epidemiological Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is highly prevalent in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. India has some of the highest rates of diabetes and hypertension worldwide, but there is a lack of local data on the coexistence of these two risk factors. This study determined the prevalence of hypertension in patients with, or at high risk of, type II diabetes mellitus from across India. METHODS: Data came from a nationwide trial evaluating the effects of yoga-based lifestyle modification for the prevention/management of type II diabetes. Participants were recruited based on randomized house-to-house screening in urban and rural areas from 65 districts of 29 states/union territories. Eligible individuals were aged 20-80 years and had diabetes or were at high risk of diabetes (IDRS ≥ 60). Anthropometric and demographic data were obtained, and resting blood pressure and blood glucose levels were recorded. RESULTS: This analysis included data from 14,135 individuals. Of these, 25% had self-reported diabetes, 19% were diagnosed with diabetes during the trial, and 26.8% were at high risk for type II diabetes. In these three patient groups, hypertension prevalence rates were 58%, 41.0%, and 35.8%, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension was highest in the North East region and lowest in the North West. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of hypertension in patients with, or at risk of diabetes, highlights the urgent need for policies to manage this population, who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and death.

Management of Hypertension in Patients with Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review of the Perceptions and Practices of Health Care Providers in India.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the perception and practices of health care providers (physicians, diabetologists, and endocrinologists) regarding the treatment of hypertension in patients with diabetes in India. METHODS: Health care providers throughout India who treated patients with diabetes and hypertension were invited to participate in an online survey and periodic 21 virtual meetings. They were questioned about their perception and practices in managing these patients, and strategies to improve blood pressure (BP). RESULTS: The online survey was completed by 2,513 health care providers, and 344 participated in virtual meetings. More than 50% reported that 31-50% of their patients with diabetes also had hypertension. Home BP monitoring was recommended by 88%, and lifestyle modifications were consistently recommended. Choice of antihypertensive treatment varied based on comorbidities, and a renin-angiotensin system blocker plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) was the most common combination for dual antihypertensive therapy. Suggested strategies to improve BP control included patient awareness/education, lifestyle modifications, better follow-up/monitoring, and optimization of therapy. CONCLUSION: Indian health care providers were aware of clinical recommendations and practices regarding treatment of patients with diabetes and hypertension, and generally make clinical decisions consistent with current guidelines. Optimization of care for these patients is essential to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and improve patient outcomes.

Management of American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology-Defined Stage 2 Hypertension by Cardiologists in India.

Uncontrolled hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and therefore requires effective approaches to patient management. This study assessed approaches to the management of patients with Stage 2 hypertension by cardiologists in India. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational, case-based questionnaire study. Data on demographic characteristics, risk factors associated with Stage 2 hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications, side effects, and approaches to education for 2,540 patients were extracted from questionnaire responses provided by 508 cardiologists. The study population of patients with Stage 2 hypertension had a mean age of 55.0 years. Most of the patients (62.6%) were aged 30 to 60 years and diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity (48.9%). Triple antihypertensive therapy was being used by 760 patients, and 634 and 1,146 patients were receiving 4 and 5 different antihypertensive medications, respectively. Telmisartan, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metoprolol, and prazosin were the commonly prescribed drugs. Ankle edema (27.7%) was the most frequent side effect of therapy. Pharmacotherapy was supported by patient education and lifestyle modifications for better blood pressure control. The standardized approach to the collection and assessment of these contemporary data provides useful insights into the characteristics and treatment of patients with Stage 2 hypertension in India.

Achieving the Latest American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Therapeutic Goals for Hypertension With Combination Therapy and Its Effects on Blood Pressure and Central Hemodynamic Parameters.

The present United States and European treatment guidelines recommend that antihypertensive therapy be initiated with a combination of agents from different classes to facilitate the achievement of control of blood pressure (BP). This prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted at 3 tertiary hospitals in India to evaluate the effects of combination therapy with an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium antagonist on office BP and central hemodynamic parameters in patients with untreated hypertension or uncontrolled BP (>130/>80 mm Hg) during treatment with antihypertensive monotherapy. Patients were randomized to treatment with telmisartan 40 mg/day + amlodipine 5 mg/day or telmisartan 40 mg/day + cilnidipine 10 mg/day. Change from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment was assessed for seated office BP, ambulatory BP monitoring, and seated central hemodynamics (central BP, aortic augmentation index, central aortic augmentation pressure, and pulse wave velocity). A total of 94 of 96 enrolled patients completed the study. From baseline to 8 weeks a significant decrease was observed in both telmisartan + amlodipine and telmisartan + cilnidipine groups for mean BP (148.0 ± 12.80 to 124.0 ± 10.4 and 144.5 ± 10.2 to 123.0 ± 10.0 mm Hg, respectively; both p <0.001); in only telmisartan + amlodipine group for mean central aortic systolic and diastolic BP (131.1 ± 19.1 to 119.7 ± 14.9 mm Hg [p <0.001] and 93.3 ± 12.0 to 89.2 ± 14.6 mm Hg [p = 0.0008], respectively) and for central aortic pulse wave velocity (7.6 ± 1.4 to 7.2 ± 1.3 m/s, p = 0.0011); in only telmisartan + cilnidipine group for aortic augmentation index (27.5 ± 14.6 to 22.3 ± 12.2; p = 0.0178). Heart rate was unchanged in both treatment groups. Combination therapy with an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium antagonist effectively reduced BP to below the new <130/80 mm Hg target and had favorable effects on central hemodynamics.

Renal denervation therapy for hypertension: truths and half-truths: Renal denervation therapy for hypertension.

Systemic hypertension is a major contributing factor for excessive morbidity and mortality globally. Experimental studies and early clinical trials showed excellent therapeutic responses to renal denervation (RDN) in patients with hypertension. However meta-analyses and objective assessments have failed to show that RDN therapy has any significant effect on blood pressure.  The aim of this review is to introduce the different methods that can be used in RDN, along with the benefits and disadvantages of these methods. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation (of renal nerves) is the most com-mon method of RDN, and we discuss the clinical evaluation of this method in the SYMPLICITY RDN trials. Finally, the development of second-generation RF devices and more comprehensive RDN procedures lead us to consider the current status and future path for RDN.

Risk factors predisposing to acute stroke in India: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is an important neurological disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. In India, the risk factors for stroke (obesity, diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, hypertension, and sedentary lifestyle) are mounting with economic growth and increasing the disease burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess the severity and risk factors of stroke in India and identify any new predisposing factors. METHODS: A multicentric (six tertiary care hospitals across India) prospective observational study (from September 2016 to July 2017) was conducted on 526 stroke patients, presenting within the first 24 h to examine the risk factors for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Severity was determined using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). RESULTS: Predominantly male (72.3%), 75% of the sample was >50 years old, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 ±â€Š4.3 kg/m2 and 14.6% obese patients. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the commonest comorbidities, followed by a history of ischemic heart disease and familial history of stroke. 20.5% of patients had mild strokes, 57.4% had moderate, 8.4% experienced moderate-severe strokes, whereas 7.2% had severe strokes. Regarding the admission diagnoses, 56.8% were ischemic, 18.6% were hemorrhagic, 1.1% had a transient ischemic attack, 6.6% suffered recurrent strokes, and 17% were other forms. CONCLUSION: The foremost risk factors for stroke in India, hypertension and diabetes, need to be controlled and treated like other global high-risk populations for stroke prevention. The NIHSS scores highlight the relationship between risk factors and stroke severity.

Correlation Between Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Office Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients with Hypertension: A Community Study.

BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for blood pressure (BP) measurements is based on office BP measurements (OBPMs) by a sphygmomanometer or a digital device. Ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) is a noninvasive method for continuous monitoring of BP over a period during routine activities of the patient. Thus, ABPM offers multiple BP readings during the patients' daily routine as compared to the single reading by OBPM at rest. A good correlation exists between mean 24-hour BP readings and the prediction of cardiovascular events. The present multicenter observational study was aimed to assess the correlation between ABPM and OBPM in patients with newly diagnosed, controlled, or uncontrolled hypertension in the community setting. Our hypothesis was to test if ABPM provides any further value in those hypertensive patients in whom the office blood pressure levels are controlled. A supplementary hypothesis was whether obtaining ABPM in patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension yields any value over and beyond OBPM. Another objective was to find out the applicability of ABPM in the community setting where the medical care is provided by primary care family physicians and not by specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods A total of 1000 patients were analysed for this study. Those with controlled hypertension were assigned to Group A, and those with newly diagnosed/untreated hypertension comprised Group B. Group A was followed up during Visit 2 and Group B was followed up during Visit 2 and either Visit 3 or Visit 4 to assess the BP measurements by ABPM and OBPM. RESULTS: The correlation between ABPM and OBPM showed minimal variation in the BP readings of Group A subjects at Visit 2. A variation in BP readings was observed in Group B at Visit 2. Furthermore, the correlation was established between ABPM and OBPM noted for Group B subjects during Visit 3, and minimal variation was noted during Visit 4. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions A good correlation was observed between ABPM and OBPM during both visits in patients in Groups A and B. However, a notable variation was noted in the diastolic BP readings. Thus, large-scale clinical studies are required to detect the prevalence of hypertension, masked hypertension, and dipping patterns associated with hypertension and other related medical co-morbidities.